Fatjoe vs Loganix: Which Fits Your SaaS?

13 of the 16 fields tracked here differ. Those rows are highlighted; the rest are where these two are effectively the same, and are worth skipping.

#10 of 26

Fatjoe

Score: 60.3
DR: 72
Traffic: 20,698

#8 of 26

Loganix

Score: 61.7
DR: 74
Traffic: 34,487

Side by side

Highlighted rows are where they actually differ

Fatjoe compared with Loganix across 16 published fields.
Field	Fatjoe	Loganix
Rank on this site	#10	#8
Score	60.3	61.7
Domain Rating	72	74
Organic traffic / mo	20,698	34,487
12-month traffic	-59%	-34%
Referring domains	4,094	3,252
Pricing	$83–$528/link	From $99/link
Entry cost per link	$83	$99
Pricing model	Per link	Per link
Published quality floor	Ahrefs DR 10+	None published
Minimum commitment	None published	None published
Guarantee	100% money-back guarantee on all services	Money-back if links not delivered; 6-month link guarantee on premium services
White-label	Yes	Yes
Named clients	None named	2
Founded	2012	Not published
Headquarters	Staffordshire, United Kingdom	Not published

A bolder cell is simply the larger number on a measurable axis. It is not a recommendation — a higher price is not a worse price, and a bigger agency is not a better fit.

Which one

Each line below points at a row that differs

Choose Fatjoe if…

your budget is the binding constraint — it starts at $83 a link against $99
you want a higher published floor — it commits to Ahrefs DR 10+

Choose Loganix if…

Nothing in the published data makes a case for Loganix over Fatjoe on its own. That is a finding, not an omission.